CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2026-6019

Improper Neutralization of Escape, Meta, or Control Sequences

Published: Apr 22, 2026 | Modified: May 28, 2026
CVSS 3.x
6.1
MEDIUM
Source:
NVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
6.8 MODERATE
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Ubuntu
MEDIUM
root.io logo minimus.io logo echo.ai logo

http.cookies.Morsel.js_output() returns an inline snippet and only escapes for JavaScript string context. It does not neutralize the HTML parser-sensitive sequence inside the generated script element. Mitigation base64-encodes the cookie value to disallow escaping using cookie value.

Weakness

The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could be interpreted as escape, meta, or control character sequences when they are sent to a downstream component.

Affected Software

NameVendorStart VersionEnd Version
PythonPython*3.15.0 (excluding)
Red Hat Hardened ImagesRedHatpython3-14-main-3.14.5-2.hum1*
Python2.7Ubuntuesm-infra/xenial*
Python3.13Ubuntuupstream*
Python3.14Ubuntudevel*
Python3.14Ubuntuupstream*
Python3.5Ubuntuesm-infra/xenial*

Potential Mitigations

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.

References