CVE Vulnerabilities

CVE-2026-63383

Out-of-bounds Read

Published: Aug 20, 2026 | Modified: Sep 09, 2026
CVSS 3.x
N/A
Source:
NVD
CVSS 2.x
RedHat/V2
RedHat/V3
7.5 IMPORTANT
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Ubuntu
MEDIUM
root.io logo minimus.io logo echo.ai logo

Libevent is an event notification library. Prior to 2.1.13 and 2.2.2-alpha, libevent can read beyond a contiguous evbuffer region in event_tagging.c when decode_tag_internal requests at most five bytes from evbuffer_pullup but iterates using the full logical buffer length. A fragmented evbuffer containing a six-byte malformed tag can therefore advance past the pullup window and trigger an out-of-bounds read, which can crash a process that decodes attacker-controlled tagged RPC data. This issue is fixed in versions 2.1.13 and 2.2.2-alpha.

Weakness

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

Affected Software

NameVendorStart VersionEnd Version
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10RedHatlibevent-0:2.1.13-1.el10_2*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8RedHatlibevent-0:2.1.8-11.el8_10*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8RedHatlibevent-0:2.1.8-11.el8_10*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9RedHatlibevent-0:2.1.13-1.el9_8*
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9RedHatlibevent-0:2.1.13-1.el9_8*
Cert Manager support for Red Hat OpenShift release 1.20RedHatcert-manager/jetstack-cert-manager-rhel9:1790223279*
Cert Manager support for Red Hat OpenShift release 1.20RedHatcert-manager/cert-manager-istio-csr-rhel9:1790223719*
Cert Manager support for Red Hat OpenShift release 1.20RedHatcert-manager/cert-manager-operator-rhel9:1790272426*
Cert Manager support for Red Hat OpenShift release 1.20RedHatcert-manager/jetstack-cert-manager-acmesolver-rhel9:1790589998*
Cert Manager support for Red Hat OpenShift release 1.20RedHatcert-manager/jetstack-cert-manager-rhel9:1790589912*
Cert Manager support for Red Hat OpenShift release 1.20RedHatcert-manager/cert-manager-istio-csr-rhel9:1790589914*
Cert Manager support for Red Hat OpenShift release 1.20RedHatcert-manager/cert-manager-operator-rhel9:1790589855*
Red Hat Hardened ImagesRedHatlibevent-main-2.1.12-19.1.hum1*
Red Hat Update Infrastructure 5RedHatrhui5/cds-kubernetes-rhel9:1790241897*
Red Hat Update Infrastructure 5RedHatrhui5/cds-rhel9:1790241954*
Red Hat Update Infrastructure 5RedHatrhui5/haproxy-rhel9:1790241900*
Red Hat Update Infrastructure 5RedHatrhui5/installer-rhel9:1790241922*
Red Hat Update Infrastructure 5RedHatrhui5/rhua-rhel9:1790242004*
LibeventUbuntuesm-infra-legacy/trusty*
LibeventUbuntuesm-infra-legacy/xenial*
LibeventUbuntuesm-infra/bionic*
LibeventUbuntuesm-infra/focal*
LibeventUbuntujammy*
LibeventUbuntunoble*
LibeventUbunturesolute*
LibeventUbuntuupstream*

Potential Mitigations

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an “accept known good” input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, “boat” may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as “red” or “blue.”
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code’s environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
  • To reduce the likelihood of introducing an out-of-bounds read, ensure that you validate and ensure correct calculations for any length argument, buffer size calculation, or offset. Be especially careful of relying on a sentinel (i.e. special character such as NUL) in untrusted inputs.

References